Daniel and the Day for Year Principle
Day for Year
A Basic Unit of Typology
Basic Idea: The Historicist position that days, in Daniel and Revelation, typically represent so many years, has solid Biblical support.
Time as Symbols in Figurative Prophecy
The dreams of two inmates of the prison where Joseph was interred were God-given revelations about the near future of each of the dreamers. In both cases the time period, three days, was represented by three items.
Two dreams of Pharaoh, later in the same story, also use items to represent time. But in this case each item represented a year.
The punishment of the unfaithful Israelites was given in terms that used days as a basis for years. That story is the origin of the “day for a year” phrase.
The correlation between days and years was such in the Hebrew economy that the term “week” was applied to both periods of seven days and to periods of seven years. Neither of these periods being amenable to those of heavenly bodies, both must be presumed to have divine origins. The weeks of years, though familiar to Laban and Jacob, were regiven to Israel after the Exodus.
Fifty days, seven weeks plus one, marked off the time between the Passover and the great Pentecost. And this very same reckoning of time, seven weeks plus one, marked off the great Jubilee.
Ezekiel, a contemporary of Daniel, also figured years by days.
These two stories in particular, of Ezekiel and Joseph, show how time is represented symbolically when embedded in starkly symbolic narrative.
The prophecy of Daniel 9, to be studied later in this class, also establishes a basis in the book of Daniel for letting a day represent a year. The prophecy extends from 457 BC to “Messiah the Prince” and all commentators confess these weeks to be weeks of years.
Of course, if it can be shown that the 490 years are a part of the 2300 days, the day-for-year principle in Daniel 8 is settled beyond question. This is the object of another lecture.
But we can give stronger evidence for the legitimacy of the day-for-year principle in the book of Daniel by examining the correlation between the prophecy of Daniel 7:25 and history.
The Correlation of Daniel 7:25 to the history of the Little Horn
Antiochus Epiphanies did not reign 1260 days. Nor did he reign 1150 days (2300 divided by 2 for “evenings and mornings.”) What is more than this, this period shows up again in Revelation (5 times) as a still-future prophecy more than two centuries after the death of A. Epiphanies.
We examined earlier the basis for using 538 and 1798 to mark off the existence of the “little” civil kingdom of papal Rome. This correlation is a pragmatic evidence of the legitimacy of the 1260 day prophecy.
Also the scope of the prophecy, from Daniel’s time until the saints possess an eternal kingdom, reduces centuries and world empires (as Babylon and Persia) into single verses. To give several verses (in this context) to the 1260 time period is some evidence in favor of the period being symbolic.
Summary: The historical understanding of Daniel 7 by the men used by God to lead the reformation still has strength enough centuries later to repel detractors. The prophecy works, the symbols are standard, the global nature of the context fits the period.
For the Word Doc: Dan_7_-_12_-_Day_for_Year